@article{nokey,

title = {The Effect of Body Position and the Reliability of Upper Limb Arterial Occlusion Pressure Using a Handheld Doppler Ultrasound for Blood Flow Restriction Training},

author = {S. Karanasios and C. Koutri and M. Moutzouri and S. A. Xergia and V. Sakellari and G. Gioftsos},

doi = {10.1177/19417381211043877},

issn = {1941-7381 (Print) 

1941-0921},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-01-01},

journal = {Sports Health},

volume = {14},

number = {5},

pages = {717-724},

abstract = {BACKGROUND: The precise calculation of arterial occlusive pressure is essential to accurately prescribe individualized pressures during blood flow restriction training. Arterial occlusion pressure in the lower limb varies significantly between different body positions while similar reports for the upper limb are lacking. HYPOTHESIS: Body position has a significant effect in upper limb arterial occlusive pressure. Using cuffs with manual pump and a handheld Doppler ultrasound can be a reliable method to determine upper limb arterial blood flow restriction. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized repeated measures design. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: Forty-two healthy participants (age mean ± SD = 28.1 ± 7.7 years) completed measurements in supine, seated, and standing position by 3 blinded raters. A cuff with a manual pump and a handheld acoustic ultrasound were used. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction was used to analyze differences between body positions. A within-subject coefficient of variation and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) test were used to calculate reproducibility and reliability, respectively. RESULTS: A significantly higher upper limb arterial occlusive pressure was found in seated compared with supine position (P < 0.031) and in supine compared with standing position (P < 0.031) in all raters. An ICC of 0.894 (95% CI = 0.824-0.939, P < 0.001) was found in supine, 0.973 (95% CI = 0.955-0.985, P < 0.001) in seated, and 0.984 (95% CI = 0.973-0.991, P < 0.001) in standing position. ICC for test-retest reliability was found 0.90 (95% CI = 0.814-0.946, P < 0.001), 0.873 (95% CI = 0.762-0.93, P < 0.001), and 0.858 (95% CI = 0.737-0.923, P < 0.001) in the supine, seated, and standing position, respectively. CONCLUSION: Upper limb arterial occlusive pressure was significantly dependent on body position. The method showed excellent interrater reliability and repeatability between different days. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Prescription of individualized pressures during blood flow restriction training requires measurement of upper limb arterial occlusive pressure in the appropriate position. The use of occlusion cuffs with a manual pump and a handheld Doppler ultrasound showed excellent reliability; however, the increased measurement error compared with the differences in arterial occlusive pressure between certain positions should be carefully considered for the clinical application of the method. STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATIONS TAXONOMY (SORT): B.},

note = {1941-0921 

Karanasios, Stefanos 

Koutri, Charikleia 

Moutzouri, Maria 

Xergia, Sofia A 

Sakellari, Vasiliki 

Gioftsos, George 

Journal Article 

Randomized Controlled Trial 

Sports Health. 2022 Sep-Oct;14(5):717-724. doi: 10.1177/19417381211043877. Epub 2021 Sep 13.},

keywords = {LAdPhyss 2 ;Kaatsu training; arterial occlusion; blood flow restriction training; reliability},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}